accounting question

Chuck chuck at pathworx.com
Fri Nov 11 02:08:40 CET 2005


On Thursday 10 November 2005 05:44 pm, Alan DeKok wrote:

would it also do the same thing if I removed the simultaneous-use=1 check 
statement from the user group? until i can figure this out that would be my 
easiest thing still allowing writing to accounting for other purposes.



> Chuck <chuck at pathworx.com> wrote:
> > If I turn accounting off, is there a way we can still pass
> > accounting through to our remote realms, or is it a global on/off
> > switch that affects everyone?
> 
>   Yes.  You can delete the "detail" and "sql" entries from accounting,
> and it won't log accounting to the local machine, but it will still
> proxy packets.
> 
> > I do notice a number of error messages about 0 length stop packets being 
> > received and I assume they are rejected.
> 
>   Yes.  That shouldn't affect anything, though.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
> 

-- 

Chuck

"Windows?? You mean the thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a 
sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a 
four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't 
stand one bit of competition? Oh, that..." -- Lee Clarke




More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list