Radius attributes and APs

[liran tal]

I'm all up for that and I'll add my contribution to the wiki of the AP's
I've encountered.

On 11/25/06, David Mitton <david at mitton.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2006 02:09 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> >Manuel Sanchez Cuenca wrote:
> > > Alan DeKok escribió:
> >
> > >>   Do you have a more specific question?
> > >>
> > > But not all APs enforce the Radius attributes. For example the Linksys
> > > wrt54g doesn't takes into account the session timeout attribute. So,
> can
> > > you tell me any AP which enforces this attribute, and others?
> >
> >   If there was such a list, it would be up on freeradius.org, or on the
> >wiki.  That is, you're asking on the FreeRADIUS list about NAS
> >documentation.
> >
> >   I suggest picking an AP, and then reading its documentation to see if
> >it supports the attributes, or asking the NAS vendor.
> >
> >   Alan DeKok.
> >--
>
> The problem with compiling such a list is acquiring the equipment to test.
> Most of us just buy a couple APs and live with with we get.
>
> I discovered that the Linksys didn't honor
> Session-Timeouts when I captured it screwing up
> EAP-POTP sessions in progress, despite our RADIUS
> server providing Session-Timeout values in every EAP exchange.
> I think it's actually not properly implementing
> the 802.1x state machine in it's timeout behavior.
>
> And I didn't go looking for this.  It was brought
> to my attention when someone else had a problem.
>
> The only AP that I know that works for everything
> I throw at it, during development, is the Cisco
> Aironet 1200 series.   The only problem is that
> it's not cheap.  But it works for me, so I don't try others.
>
> Dave.
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20061128/a86d8f84/attachment.html>