Reccomended switches for dynamic vlans
Jacob Jarick
mem.namefix at gmail.com
Mon Jul 16 02:23:49 CEST 2007
Thanks for the wealth of info guys :)
On 7/16/07, Hugh Messenger <hugh at alaweb.com> wrote:
> Peter Nixon said:
> > Yep. The problem I have with this change though is that what are the other
> > vendor disconnect keys? If you read the RFC it doesn't specify a specific
> > key (Alan has been holding ongoing discussions about this on the ietf-
> > radext
> > list), just that there should be enough info to identify the correct
> > session. As Cisco also uses it (and Juniper from AFAIK)
> > XAscendSessionSvrKey
> > has become a de-facto standard along with MS-Primary-DNS-Server and its
> > ilk.
> > Given that it is possible to send and have work a Disconnect-Request
> > containing only a User-Name and there is no-where specified that there
> > should be an individual session key I am not sure its worth changing
> > unless
> > someone can come up with a concrete example of a vendor who uses a session
> > key thats different.... Is there?
>
> I don't know of any, but as more gear starts to support PoD / CoA /
> Disconnect-Message / whatever, I'm sure they'll crop up. Mark my words, the
> Atlanta Scientific Tanning Salons and Wireless Switches latest model
> TanNSurf-5000 will implement TanNSurf-Disconnect-Key at some point.
>
> I guess I just don't like contributing to the de-facto
> standardizationificationism of vendor specific attributes. And besides
> which, XAscendSessionSvrKey is a biatch to type. :)
>
> Your call. You (one of) Da Man.
>
> > Peter Nixon
>
> -- hugh
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list