Statistics tool?

[Alan Dekok]

Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> Actually ... it might be an idea to add another return path which drops 
> the request and sends no reply, just to make the RADIUS server seem dead 
> if any of it's critical dependencies fail.

  I've been discussing similar issues on the IETF RADIUS list.  It seems
that the RFC's say the server MUST respond to the NAS for
Access-Requests.  Despite that, many people think it's a good idea to
NOT respond in some situations.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog