IPv6 deployment "howto"

[Alan DeKok]

Matthias Cramer wrote:
> No, i unse 1.1.3 because this is the last version which seams not to
> have the sighup bug.

  "seems".  *NO* version of 1.x is safe under HUP.  Maybe it's easier to
reproduce in 1.1.4 and later.  But 1.1.3 isn't safe, either.

  I've been doing some massive code changes in the code in CVS in order
to enable HUP.  I don't think it will be in 2.0, but maybe 2.0.1, or 2.1.

  Handling HUP correctly is *hard*.

  Alan DeKok.