performance report?

[Anders Holm]

It is not likely your actually putting too much strain on the server side.
You¹ll need quite a lot of machines hammering the RADIUS server before it¹ll
break into a sweat. The client side would have higher CPU utilization then
the server side, per request.

Comparing one program to another is not exactly comparing apples with
apples. It¹s more like comparing a duck with a fork lift. One flies, the
other just doesn¹t (or rather, when it does, you don¹t want to be there to
see it) ...

//anders

On 20/08/2008 20:18, "Kevin J" <kevinsmailer at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Does anybody know the performance on Sun T-1000?
> Just noticed that radius cannot reach more than 20% CPU time when we ran a
> heavy traffic with nas simulations.  We have tested some other programs and
> could reach even more than 90% so just curious anybody experienced the similar
> result.
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20080820/6f3e36e2/attachment.html>