rlm_perl behavior

[Alan DeKok]

Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
> I understand that there may some benefits in the current
> implementation (2.1.x) such as less threads, smaller memory
> footprint etc. but why change something that has been tested
> and working in the first place?

  A quest to make it better.  If we were satisfied with the
functionality of the server in 1.0, we would have had no improvements
since then.

  In any case, it looks like it may be easy to change it so that there
is one Perl thread per server thread.  Would you be prepared to test
patches?

  Alan DeKok.