Releasing 2.1.5 or 2.1.6

[John Dennis]

Alan DeKok wrote:
> John Dennis wrote:
>   
>> I'd like to package up the current release but I can't because the
>> current tar files have version problems. What is currently on the
>> download link is 2.1.4 but builds as 2.1.5. There have been two
>> different versions of the 2.1.4 tar file. This means we can never
>> release a 2.1.4 RPM because it's versioning is ambiguous. IMHO the 2.1.4
>> release should be considered defunct.
>>     
>
>   Yes.
>
>   
>> P.S.: We also need to be careful, if what becomes 2.1.5 is not identical
>> to what's in the 2.1.4 tar file we should go to 2.1.6 because we won't
>> be able to disambiguate between a 2.1.5 built from a 2.1.4 tar file and
>> the actual 2.1.5 built from a 2.1.5 tar file. This means the next
>> release should probably be 2.1.6 with 2.14 and 2.1.5 marked as suspect
>> in the changelog.
>>     
>
>   The next release will be 2.1.6.
>   
Do we have a target date? Do we need to get volunteers testing a trial 
2.1.6 so we can move forward?

-- 
John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com>

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20090422/b51c192d/attachment.html>