FreeRADIUS Server Version 2.1.6 has been released
Meyers, Dan
d.meyers at lancaster.ac.uk
Mon May 18 15:56:12 CEST 2009
Can I just check, as I can't seen anything about it in the changelog and
the wiki page for it appears to be the same as before - What is the
rlm_perl behaviour with the new version of FreeRADIUS?
As I recall rlm_perl no longer handles its own threading. One of the
issues for several people introduced with the previous version of
FreeRADIUS was there only ever being a single perl thread, which was a
bottleneck, where the desired functionality was 1 perl thread (or
process, if compiled with multiplicity instead of threading) per radius
thread.
I'm also assuming multiplicity takes preference, as our system installed
with 2.1.4 had perl installed with both, and our radius process starts
up at 200M but doesn't grow in the way you'd expect if we had a memory
leak in our perl. I can't think what's taking up all that memory if it's
not multiple perl processes. The same code on a system with perl
compiled without threading or multiplicity only takes 16M.
Thanks for the update, the radwatch script in particular will be very
useful for us :)
--
Dan Meyers
Network Specialist, Lancaster University
E-Mail: d.meyers at lancaster.ac.uk
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list