CA_file vs. CA_path

[Alan DeKok]

David Mitchell wrote:
> I now have 2.1.10 compiled and running. It seems to work fine. I did
> have to make one change to my configuration. I had been using CA_path to
> refer to the certificates which can authenticate clients for EAP-TLS
> authentication in 2.1.8. In 2.1.10, that doesn't seem to work. If I
> specify a single file via CA_file that works fine. I can manage either
> way I think since the file referenced in CA_file can contain multiple
> certificates. I did verify that I had run 'c_rehash' in my CA_path
> directory. I'm not sure why CA_path doesn't work since the OpenSSL docs
> indicate that they are largely interchangable. Is it an intentional
> change?

  Nope.  It's not an intentional change.  I don't know why it would be
different.

  Alan DeKok.