Generating timing stats for ntlm_auth
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Oct 16 10:32:19 CEST 2013
Matthew Newton <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:54:12AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
>> In any case, it's not new in 2.2.1. So I think it's time to release
>2.2.2.
>
>Will you include Phil's patch[0] to fix return code testing in 'if'?
>
>https://github.com/philmayers/freeradius-server/commit/51c43419
>
>Even if it's going to change for v3, it probably shouldn't break
>existing configs in v2.
>
>Cheers
>
>Matthew
>
>
>[0]
>https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2013-October/068640.html
>
>--
>Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at le.ac.uk>
>
>Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
>I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United
>Kingdom
>
>For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>
>-
>List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
>http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
For avoidance of doubt I think changing this behaviour would be a problem. In particular it would make certain styles of policy {} block next-to impossible to write.
--
Sent from my phone with, please excuse brevity and typos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20131016/bb2e0e38/attachment.html>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list