attr_filter rule evaluation

[Alan DeKok]

On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Gerald Vogt <vogt at spamcop.net> wrote:
> I don't need more complex filtering. But it would help if the files
> installed would contain some useful examples. If that DEFAULT entry just
> filters out any Service-Type and Login-Service attribute then that's not
> what I would expect from seeing this in an unmodified file distributed
> from the source.

  Sure.

> So may I suggest that the post-proxy file only contains actually useful
> and working examples.

  In these situations, I may suggest sending a patch via github.

  Pointing out a problem is nice.  Giving a fix is MUCH nicer.

  Alan DeKok.