State of RadSec in FR 3.0.10

[Sebastian Hagedorn]

--On 24. November 2015 um 10:50:33 -0500 Alan DeKok 
<aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:

>> But our national Eduroam center (DFN) recommends using radsecproxy
>> instead, because according to them RadSec isn't yet stable in FR 3.0.
>> What's your take on that? To be honest, I'd rather help fix problems in
>> FR's RadSec implementation than install another piece of software -
>> unless you recommend against it.
>
>   RedSec is stable in 3.0.10.

Thanks, that's what I thought. Unless DFN put their foot down and won't 
allow us to us it, I will give it a try.
-- 
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
   .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20151124/2e6c05b9/attachment.sig>