4.0.x Release Date

[Philipp Trenz]

Hi,

thanks for answering. The main functionality I need is RadSec I'm not very shure on which 
version it is practical to use. The other things I'll get to work I think. Maybe you can get me 
a hint which version, or which not, to use?

Thank you much!

Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 19:19:52 CEST schrieb freeradius-users-
request at lists.freeradius.org:
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:51:15 +0000
> From: Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk>
> To: "freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org"
> 	<freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org>
> Subject: Re: 4.0.x Release Date
> Message-ID:
> 	
<DB5PR04MB111196F42778A4E93A555AD1A7F40 at DB5PR04MB1111.eurprd04.prod.outlo
ok
> .com>
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> hi,
> 
> >More precice I'm standing before the questions to wait for the next
> >release while using 3.0.x or 4.0.x. It will be no complex
> >infrastructure, just LDAP, PEAP w. MS-CHAPv2 and unsing the proxy.
> 
> a common question.  if you want latest features, then 3.1.x will do the
> MSCHAPv2 stuff for you much better with winbind native and the LDAP
> stuff is much better too.
> 
>  *currently* there is little difference with 3.1.x and 4.0.x config BUT that
> is set to change massively. (I'd prefer the big changes just go to 4.1.x
> and 4.0.x becomes what it is now.....)
> 
> (so whilst docs may say one thing, it may be best to wait for main
> developers to have a clear answer!)
> 
> alan
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:59:24 -0400
> From: Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
> 	<freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org>
> Subject: Re: 4.0.x Release Date
> Message-ID: <CBE58A41-403B-46AE-8E14-4C87C7C8C561 at deployingradius.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
> > *currently* there is little difference with 3.1.x and 4.0.x config BUT
> > that is set to change massively. (I'd prefer the big changes just go to
> > 4.1.x and 4.0.x becomes what it is now.....)
>   Major releases are for changes which break configurations.  We don't do
> that in a minor release.
> 
>   We can't release version 3.2.  OS vendors refuse to upgrade for years, and
> we just don't have enough people to to support 4-5 "stable" releases
> > (so whilst docs may say one thing, it may be best to wait for main
> > developers to have a clear answer!)
> 
>   Use 3.0.
> 
>   If you know what you're doing, and you *need* the functionality in 3.1,
> then use 3.1.
> 
>   Otherwise, wait for 4.0.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:02:49 +0000
> From: Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk>
> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
> 	<freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org>
> Subject: Re: 4.0.x Release Date
> Message-ID:
> 	
<DB5PR04MB1111641E8D515F21292200D6A7F40 at DB5PR04MB1111.eurprd04.prod.outlo
ok
> .com>
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> hi,
> 
> so the key message is
> 
> "Use 3.0, unless you know what you're doing, and you *need* the
> functionality in 3.1, then use 3.1. Otherwise, wait for 4.0"
> 
> - so if people are aware of 3.1.x extra functionality, thats okay - but what
> about bugs/issues found in 3.1.x ?
> 
> alan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:20:59 -0400
> From: Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
> 	<freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org>
> Subject: Re: 4.0.x Release Date
> Message-ID: <CC6CEE2D-FE14-4769-BF8A-8F8818B5E856 at deployingradius.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
> > so the key message is
> > 
> > "Use 3.0, unless you know what you're doing, and you *need* the
> > functionality in 3.1, then use 3.1. Otherwise, wait for 4.0"
> 
>   Yes.
> 
> > - so if people are aware of 3.1.x extra functionality, thats okay - but
> > what about bugs/issues found in 3.1.x ?
>   Submit a patch.
> 
>   We can commit to maintaining 3.0, and doing development on 4.0.  Adding
> another release is just too much.
> 
>   So... anyone needing a fix in 3.1 should submit a fix. :(
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> -- 
 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.png
Type: image/png
Size: 56371 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20160920/5db2167a/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20160920/5db2167a/attachment-0001.sig>