Outer User-Name is not anonymized

[Matthew Newton]

On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 08:27 +0000, Vieri via Freeradius-Users wrote:
> I'd like to know why FR thinks that the outer User-Name is not
> anonymized when a Windows client connects with supposedly anonymized
> identity (blank or 'anon').
> Is it because the domain part is always passed even if the user is
> blank?

Windows doesn't use the standard NAI format for its usernames.

Just ignore the warning.

-- 
Matthew