ldap load-balance

[Elias Pereira]

Calm dowm, Allan!!! Why the stress!?

What's your goal here?

Why the question? My argument was based on the configuration that I asked
if it was correct! I put this setting in the ldap module and it worked.

But first I wanted to get your opinion if it was really correct. It was you
who missed my point.

  If you're going to ignore the documentation and argue endlessly, then I
> suggest forking FreeRADIUS.  You can then fix it to do whatever you want,
> and you don't need us.

  if you're not going to fork FreeRADIUS, then it works as documented.
> Read the documentation.  Stop arguing.  Stop reading (and misunderstanding)
> random things you find on the net.


If I am here on the list it is because I have doubts. Doubts that I have
already read the documentation and so far, could not solve.

Why do you act this way? I am not the first and I will not be the last one
that you act this way! It is not necessary!

Does that mean that no one on this list is free to question anything?
Doesn't "democracy" reign here?


On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 11:05 AM Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
wrote:

> On Oct 7, 2022, at 9:58 AM, Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Arran Cudbard-Bell says it works.
>
>   No, that's not what he says.  He says libldap has certain
> functionality.  He doesn't say that FreeRADIUS supports this.
>
>   What's your goal here?
>
>   If you're going to ignore the documentation and argue endlessly, then I
> suggest forking FreeRADIUS.  You can then fix it to do whatever you want,
> and you don't need us.
>
>   if you're not going to fork FreeRADIUS, then it works as documented.
> Read the documentation.  Stop arguing.  Stop reading (and misunderstanding)
> random things you find on the net.
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>


-- 
Elias Pereira