3 Aug
2007
3 Aug
'07
4:38 p.m.
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 21:27 +0100, A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
why a different error message if its done via clients rather than SQL?
It's not different. One patch adds a generall error message for dup clients, not matter which methods adds them. The other one adds a message for rlm_sql if it failed to add a client. If you use both patches the output should look pretty the same no matter if the client is added from clients.conf or nas table. Stephan Jaeger -- Stephan Jaeger <stephan.jaeger@ewetel.de>