15 Sep
2005
15 Sep
'05
1:51 p.m.
Nicolas Baradakis <nbk@sitadelle.com> wrote:
I'm not against the idea, but I'm well satisfied with CVS. It's a well known tool, and widely spread. It sure lacks features, but there isn't many developpers committing code (no problem to merge versions), and there isn't more than two active branches (the stable release and the head). I don't mind keeping two local copies of the repository.
Monotone still helps. I don't think I'll shut down CVS, but adding a parallel monotone server would be handy. It would also enable people outside of the server to set up their own repositories, and to send patches back as monotone changes, rather than "diff"s Alan DeKok.