Re: 1.2?

Alan DeKok wrote:

I'm thinking of gradually pulling the features from the CVS head into the 1.x branch. They've been tested for a while, so they *should* be OK.

I agree.

My suggestion:

1.2.0 = 1.1.2 with autoconf changes ...

I think half of the work has been done in 1.1.1 because the differences with the Makefiles in CVS head are minimal. The autoconf upgrade shouldn't be very hard, but it'll take time because there're a lot of configure.in files. -- Nicolas Baradakis