schema divergence in SQL flavours..
hi, is there any particular reason why the mysql and postgres schema differ in their naming conventions for the radpostauth table? this makes it more interesting for users to utilise, eg sql_log module as the values in radiusd.conf are the MySQL values in the radpostauth schema...and not postgresql's alan
On Mon 17 Sep 2007, A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
hi,
is there any particular reason why the mysql and postgres schema differ in their naming conventions for the radpostauth table? this makes it more interesting for users to utilise, eg sql_log module as the values in radiusd.conf are the MySQL values in the radpostauth schema...and not postgresql's
Yep. These should be standardised.. -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/
On Mon 17 Sep 2007, A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
hi,
is there any particular reason why the mysql and postgres schema differ in their naming conventions for the radpostauth table? this makes it more interesting for users to utilise, eg sql_log module as the values in radiusd.conf are the MySQL values in the radpostauth schema...and not postgresql's
OK. I have standardised the mysql names to match postgresql. user -> username (To match the rest of the tables) date -> authdate (Because 'date' is a reserved word in some SQL dialects) Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/
participants (2)
-
A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk -
Peter Nixon