On Tue 18 May 2010, Alan DeKok wrote:
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Not meaning any disrespect to the "paid" offer, you could also reconsider to put up the current documentation in a "Wiki" style webpage, and from there everyone can work on the text that they think needs reworking.
We already have a Wiki. Few people edit it. We already have a publicly available "doc" directory. Few people submit changes.
Putting the existing docs into a Wiki won't magically make people submit changes.
We're looking for an editor. All we want is someone who can organize and format the existing documentation. There is no need for "in depth" knowledge of RADIUS. There is no need for to write *new* documentation.
That is work which is normally seen as "not fun". But it's needed. Therefore, the offer to pay for services rendered.
Yes. I'll second Alan on this. It was my idea to setup the wiki, and I spent a LOT of time on it for a year or so, but have unfortunately not seen as much input from the community as we will have liked. (Although there are a notable few people who have done some work at various times... You know who your are..Thanks.) If there is only going to be a small group of people editing the docs, git and RST work much better than a wiki, and save maintaing both mediawiki and an SQL server :-) -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/