No, just the sample detail files are fine. I'll take a look today / tomorrow.
could you find any problem? I asked developer to rename detail.work to a distinct name each time. I noticed the skipping packet is seen in debug right after renaming detail.work say to backup-1000.work if packet is received after renaming and deleting detail.work why it exists in backup-1000.work instead of backup-1001.work? or maybe everything is happening exactly at the same time and the order of debug lines is not accurate. this is sample debug: Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Renaming to /var/log/freeradius/radacct/backup-1000.work Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Unlinking /var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail.work Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Polling for detail file Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Detail listener state unopened waiting 0.952720 sec Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449) Received Accounting-Request Id 162 from 82.21.11.91:18886 to 82.21.11.50:1813 length 107 Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449) User-Name = "mks8435" Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449) NAS-IP-Address = 82.21.11.91 Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449) NAS-Port = 1152 Tue Feb 7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449) Acct-Status-Type = Stop .... (this is the packet which is in backup-1000.work and was never read by module)