21 May
2007
21 May
'07
3:21 a.m.
nikitha george wrote:
On 5/20/07, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
If valgrind doesn't say that the memory is lost, then the memory is very likely still being used. i.e. It's likely needed for something.
something..?
Did you read my earlier explanations?
Why do radiusd need to hold the memory even after cleaning up the request?
Did you read my earlier message explaining this?
Even after stopping the request, the memory never gets freed. Why is this strange result of huge memory usage by radiusd?
Did you read my earlier message explaining this? Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog