On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:40:14AM -0400, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:14:30PM +0000, Stefan Paetow wrote:
I know about that.... but in my case i have a lot of vsas, and I would not want to have to create one for each.
Either that, or use Arran's version that calls xlat to translate the temporary strings. Your choice really. :-)
Or, e.g. use rlm_perl.
Or don't :(
Have you read the code in rlm_perl? ew.
I don't personally, which is why I suggested automating unlang output. But it is another solution, even if not necessarily a good one! Making a call-out to another language like that always seems like a bad idea to me, unless absolutely required - it "feels" like it's going to be slow, whether it actually is or not. If I wanted something unusual I'd be more inclined to just hack it up as a C module. Having said that, and noting Alan's comments that it's unlikely to happen, having parameters to policies is something I've thought would be useful for a while. Otherwise you tend to end up with an ugly 'update Tmp-String-X' before/after the policy call just to get around it. But as much as I'd thought it would be useful, so far I don't believe I've actually got any config where I would have used it... Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk>