17 Feb
2013
17 Feb
'13
5:15 p.m.
Oh wow; that's even cooler! I'll give that module a shot. Thanks! On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:12 PM, <A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi,
The question to the list, are there other solution approaches that might be better? Any significant disadvantages to using rlm_perl as I've described? Would it be better to write a custom module instead, hoping that by doing so there may be some performance improvements?
PERL method should be fine...the alternative is the latest HEAD (3.x) pre-release code which actually has an rlm_rest module (so no writing of a module to be done!)
alan