6 Nov
2015
6 Nov
'15
3:36 p.m.
Alan DeKok wrote:
Yes. That's because it was just simpler to set it up that way.
Patches are welcome. :)
We're working on simplifying and re-designing the server core for 3.1 / 3.2. That will make all of this work by design. The current system was cobbled together over time, and is less than perfect.
Thanks, Alan, that makes things much clearer. That being the case, I don't see a way other than the (deprecated) use_tunneled_reply to pop state out of the inner tunnel (barring some other clever trick?), so I hope I'm OK in assuming use_tunneled_reply will be sticking around until after that refactor "hits shelves"?