22 May
2010
22 May
'10
1:56 p.m.
John Dennis wrote:
Bottom line: I think the practice of loading every file found in a directory is inherently risky and bug prone. I think it should only load files with a specific extension, that seems much safer. This still works nicely with the enabled/available split.
Sure. Is it critical enough to delay 2.1.9? Consider that there have been *sporadic* complaints since 2.0.0 (late 2007). Personally, I'd wait for 2.1.10. This work involves code changes *and* renaming configuration files. That's pretty drastic, and should be well tested before being released. Alan DeKok.