They wouldn't all listen on different interfaces. We'd be storing the clients in ldap and defining which virtual server to use at that level. -----Original Message----- From: Freeradius-Users [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+clayton.knorr=nuspire.com@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Arran Cudbard-Bell Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:26 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Subject: Re: Maximum number of virtual servers?
On 15 Feb 2017, at 19:22, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Clayton Knorr <clayton.knorr@nuspire.com> wrote:
Any opinions (or hard facts) about the upper limit of virtual servers are advisable? Potentially more than 1,000 if we decide to go the virtual server route.
There is no limit. The virtual servers are placed into efficient data structures (trees) so that having 1000 is not much more expensive than having 1.
That being said... 1000 seems a bit large. Why do you need that many?
I could see the issue being select() if they’re bound to 1000+ interfaces. -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS Development Team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2