On 4 May 2016, at 08:05, Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> wrote:
On 4 May 2016, at 05:19, Jonathan Gazeley <Jonathan.Gazeley@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
On 04/05/16 13:15, A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
Don't worry folks - this isn't a repeat of the same question about multiple LDAP servers. I've read the docs and I know how it's *supposed* to work, but I think I've found a discrepancy in the messages printed by the server. I'm running FreeRADIUS 3.0.11.
you ge the same with 3.1.x - if defined in one line you get that same warning message. havent had time to look at the 'correct' way that the server suggests yet...which is multiple 'server' lines - which as you say seems to not work at all as expected - as I havent looked into it, I havent submitted a bug on github.
alan -
Looks like Arran was talking about the new syntax at least in April 2015:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18060771/how-to-configure-freeradius-with... Arran, what counts as "later versions of FreeRADIUS 3"?
If you want visibility into what's going on, it's better to use a template section to configure rlm_ldap, and have one instance per server, referencing them in a redundant-load-balance block. -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS Development Team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2