14 Jul
2005
14 Jul
'05
3:26 p.m.
apparently we do agree. thanks to Josh for his comment. just one thing: Alan DeKok wrote:
Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
I think the point the original poster was making was that Diameter allows arbitrary conversations between NASes and servers that are initiated by either party, via "applications", in an extensible manner.
Yup.
Which clients support diameter? I can't think of any.
Until Cisco starts shipping diameter clients in their boxes, all of this discussion is wishful thinking.
see? as i said: now you _started_ talking about God :-) ciao artur