Hello, yes, tacacs+ would be great. Miroslav Dne 15.4.2014 05:10, Thomas Fagart napsal(a):
Hello
We would switch for sure. That would allow us to maintain one software instead of two.
Thomas
Le 15 avr. 2014 à 01:10, "Andrew Kee" <adkee@oakland.edu <mailto:adkee@oakland.edu>> a écrit :
Having this in freeRADIUS would be great. It would be nice to have an alternative to radiator. We need tacacs+ for per command authorization so RADIUS won't cut it for switches
--- Andrew — Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk <mailto:mcn4@leicester.ac.uk>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:27:20AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: > Is anyone interested in TACACS+ support in FreeRADIUS?
Interested, yes, but probably not enough that other things should be pushed out of the way. I can live without it, but it would be a nice to have.
Mainly because Cisco don't support checking shell commands against RADIUS for some annoying reason.
Cheers,
Matthew
-- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk <mailto:mcn4@le.ac.uk>>
Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk <mailto:ithelp@le.ac.uk>> - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- Mgr. Miroslav Lednický Vedoucí odboru správy datové sítě a hlasových služeb Úsek Informatiky Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně Pekařská 664/53, 656 91, Brno