Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
The message should be clear. What part is hard to understand? See also:
http://deployingradius.com/documents/protocols/compatibility.html
I checked out the link provided (and the source code) and I still take issue with the message. It says it needs the NT-Password but doesn't clearly indicate if it has an NT-Password. Clearly if it needs one but it doesn't have one that's a problem. However if it needs one and it has what it needs, well that's just a nice informative message. When I read "we need NT-Password" I read that as "we need NT-Password in order to operate but are missing one", this of course is subjective others might read it the other way. The question is, why bother mentioning it at all in that case? I need air to breathe. I have plenty of air though, so it's not a big deal. It's safe to assume I have air unless I say otherwise. If I told you I need air, you'd (hopefully) become concerned for my well being.
Then it's the cause of the reject, isn't it?
Turns out it wasn't, there was a mismatch in the passwords. Sometimes you spend so much time looking at the tiny details you miss the obvious. After I put the correct password in everything was fine. -Matt