I would instead do:
bangpath if (!updated) { suffix { ... } }
I would favour this approach. I assume that if I call bangpath inside a policy recipe, this would still apply: rfc7542_recipe if (!updated) { suffix { ... } } If I muck about with the control list, it would be making a difference to the status of 'updated', correct? Otherwise we'll update the recipe to include the call to suffix directly as per above. :-) With Regards Stefan Paetow Consultant, Trust and Identity t: +44 (0)1235 822 125 gpg: 0x3FCE5142 xmpp: stefanp@jabber.dev.ja.net skype: stefan.paetow.janet jisc.ac.uk Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.