22 May
2015
22 May
'15
7:50 a.m.
On May 22, 2015, at 2:47 AM, Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@gmail.com> wrote:
If you're going to interpret text as saying the *opposite* of what it says, you can justify anything.
I'm playing devil's advocate somewhat here,
I already know that people can come up with the most ridiculous interpretations of the specs. I've said so repeatedly in this thread. There's no need to advocate for a ridiculous interpretation when I've already admitted it exists. In this content, arguing for ridiculous interpretations isn't playing devils advocate. It's poking me with a sharp stick, and then acting surprised when I get cranky. Alan DeKok.