On Sat 07 Jul 2007, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:49 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Stefan Winter wrote:
It's a long shot, but: wouldn't it make sense to clear the wording for 2.0? I know, it would break all existing configs out there, but manually working through the config is needed anyways... I know that this wording startled me quite a bit when I was new here...
It's worth doing.
The problem is we can't call the post-authentication step "authorize", because that will confuse everyone upgrading from 1.x.
I think the default configuration should be "pre-auth", "auth", and "post-auth". We can still accept "authorize" as a synonym for "pre-auth" in the short term.
+1 - excellent idea
+1 - Makes more sense...
So proxying logic is done in pre-auth , authentication in auth , and reply formulation in post-auth...
Yeah far better :) No more reply formulation for users who are going to be rejected ....
+ Remove post auth query from SQL module ... functionality can be replicated in unlang with minimum of fuss.
Why do this? The ability to log things to sql post-auth is very usefull and I believe fairly widely used. What is the advantage of removing it? -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc