It is a matter which needs attention of Alan or Arran. Kindly send a Bug Report so that this situation can be evaluated by the developers. On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:29 PM, nfourel <nicolas.fourel@adipsys.com> wrote:
I have the same result with integer rather than integer64. I tried on a 32 bit server, and indeed, if I put a value bigger than 2^32 octets in Max-Input-Octets check-item, it wraps to 4294967295 octets and not to zero. So the problem seems to be with 64bit architecture and value bigger than 2^32 octets (like 100GB). Very strange behavior.****
** **
Nicolas****
** **
*De :* Suman Dash [via FreeRadius] [mailto:[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4802672&i=0>]
*Envoyé :* mercredi 14 septembre 2011 14:53
*À :* nfourel *Objet :* Re: Problem with rml_sqlcounter with GigaByte datavolume****
** **
I have a working setup which takes Check-Item over 100GB But being a 32Bit counter is wraps in 2GB limit. I have not tried Integer64. Can you check what happens when you change it to 32bit in dictionary instead of declaring it as 64bit ?
****
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:53 PM, nfourel <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4802642&i=0>> wrote:****
The « check_item=0 » is reason why I posted my messages on this ML. If I put a value lesser than 2^32 (for example 1000000) for “Max-Input-Octets” in radcheck for username ‘click here. ****
------------------------------ View this message in context: RE: Problem with rml_sqlcounter with GigaByte datavolume<http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-rml-sqlcounter-with-GigaByte-datavolume-tp4455164p4802672.html> Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive<http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/FreeRadius-User-f2740693.html>at Nabble.com.
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html