Hi Kindly find the error messages shown below. n.c:361: `gstate' undeclared (first use in this function) rlm_python.c:361: warning: implicit declaration of function `PyGILState_Ensure' rlm_python.c: In function `python_load_function': rlm_python.c:470: `PyGILState_STATE' undeclared (first use in this function) rlm_python.c:470: parse error before "gstate" rlm_python.c:472: `gstate' undeclared (first use in this function) rlm_python.c: In function `python_objclear': rlm_python.c:508: `PyGILState_STATE' undeclared (first use in this function) rlm_python.c:508: parse error before "__gstate" rlm_python.c:510: `__gstate' undeclared (first use in this function) gmake[6]: *** [rlm_python.lo] Error 1 gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/home/freeradius-server-2.1.4/src/modules/rlm_python' gmake[5]: *** [common] Error 2 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/home/freeradius-server-2.1.4/src/modules' gmake[4]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/freeradius-server-2.1.4/src/modules' gmake[3]: *** [common] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/freeradius-server-2.1.4/src' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/freeradius-server-2.1.4/src' gmake[1]: *** [common] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/freeradius-server-2.1.4' make: *** [all] Error 2 [root@Radius freeradius-server-2.1.4]# Regards Anoop -----Original Message----- From: freeradius-users-bounces+anoop.cherilthody=sifycorp.com@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+anoop.cherilthody=sifycorp.com@lists.freera dius.org] On Behalf Of freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 1:21 PM To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Subject: Freeradius-Users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 27 Send Freeradius-Users mailing list submissions to freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freeradius.org/mailman/listinfo/freeradius-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org You can reach the person managing the list at freeradius-users-owner@lists.freeradius.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Freeradius-Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: checking authorization in the duration of connection (Nyamul Hassan) 2. Re: Fair usage package implementation (Ming-Ching Tiew) 3. Outer identity being used for LDAP group lookup in users file (Paul Dealy) 4. Free radius 2.1.4 Installation (anoop c) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:38:01 +0600 From: "Nyamul Hassan" <mnhassan@usa.net> Subject: Re: checking authorization in the duration of connection To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <4FE512A198C84C929C304F31FCC1FB54@carteslap> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Phew... thanks for relieving me. Mikrotik does have their problems, indeed. With each new update, sometimes new bugs are added. But, having used it for some time now, and extensively, we've had to learn how to adapt our requirements to Mikrotik's abilities. The biggest benefit that we find is, it uses Linux's powerful iptables and related TCP / IP software, and provides a very nice GUI, which is easy to teach to my techies for monitoring / basic config. Regards HASSAN ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Kalik" <tnt@kalik.net> To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 20:58 Subject: Re: checking authorization in the duration of connection
Sorry for barging into the thread, but something just caught my attention. We use Mikrotik throughout our network, and have found them quite useful and with the right hardware, it performs pretty well in our setup.
But, there are guys in this forum who are quite frankly, way ahead than myself in terms of both knowledge and experience. So, could you please elaborate why you rate Mikrotik as dumb? Perhaps I am already in trouble!
And plenty other people find it buggy and quirky. It has claims to support many things which then turns out to be half-baked. But with realistic demands - it's great value for money.
Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 17:51:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Ming-Ching Tiew <mctiew@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Fair usage package implementation To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <158542.11592.qm@web31506.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- On Sat, 5/9/09, Ming-Ching Tiew <mctiew@yahoo.com> wrote:
--------------------begin--------------------------------------------------- ----
Sending Accounting-Response of id 5 to 192.168.130.220 port 3790 WARNING: Unknown destination 192.168.130.220:3799 for CoA request. Do CoA Fail handler here Finished request 9.
--------------------end----------------------------------------------------- --
For this particular NAS, I have set up the coaport to be 3790, as you can see in the radius reply the radius server is sending Accounting-Response to it.
Why there is a warning of 'Unknown destination 192.168.130.220.3799 for CoA request' ? Is it because the NAS is not setup properly to listen to port 3799 ? Where does the figure 3799 come from, a standard port number ?
I have ruled out the possibility of NAS configuration problem because if I exec a radclient from radiusd, it works properly. It must be my idiot understanding of configuration of CoA on radiusd, which seems to also needing the setting of up "home-server" and so on which at this moment I barely understand what they are. Regards. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:45:46 +1000 From: Paul Dealy <pdealy@gmail.com> Subject: Outer identity being used for LDAP group lookup in users file To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Message-ID: <9ded84ce0905101945pa697ff3y8531c3044cce679@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In my "users" file I preform an Ldap-Group lookup and allocate vlan based on this. i.e. DEFAULT Ldap-Group != "cn=DisabledRadiusUsers,ou=roles,ou=services,o=abc" The issue I am having is if a user has an Outer Identity set, the Ldap-Group lookup is performed against this username not the Inner Identity username. Is there any way of ensuring that the lookup is performed against the "real" inner identity not the "fake" outer identity? Cheers, Paul ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:20:50 +0530 From: "anoop c" <anoop.cherilthody@sifycorp.com> Subject: Free radius 2.1.4 Installation To: <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <200905110751.n4B7p904008274@mxdrop231.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi I am getting the following errors while installing the FREERADIUS 2.1.4. The following error coming after the execution of 'make' command. Kindly look into this and suggest. Regards Anoop