Hi Arran, thanks for the quick reply. I see my task as a piece of research and I'll try to test the RadSec implementation even if it should be common sense in Germany to use the RadSecProxy, if my supervisor provides me with this. If I'll encounter any bugs I'll report them. Greetings! Am 2016-08-15 11:38, schrieb Arran Cudbard-Bell:
On 15 Aug 2016, at 11:28, Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@uni-koeln.de> wrote:
Hi,
--On 15. August 2016 um 11:22:37 +0200 Philipp Trenz <mail@philipptrenz.de> wrote:
my name is Philipp Trenz, I'm student at the University of Applied Science Harz and work there at the datacenter. I'm charged with updating the EDUROAM wifi auth infrastructure and searching for experiences with the RadSec implementation in FreeRadius3 in cooperation with the radius-servers of the German DFN or in general. I heared of different voices. At https://wiki.geant.org/display/H2eduroam/freeradius3-flr it says FR3 can replace third party software like RadSecProxy, but I also heared that the implementation does not work that fine.
At the moment it's going to be FreeRADIUS 3.0.4 on a RHEL7.2, but also could go up to the latest stable release, if this would fix issues.
I'd be very glad to hear some of your experiences! we were told by DFN that we must use RadSecProxy, and it works just fine.
If there are issues we haven't be made aware of them. It would be useful if any users have run into issues with RADSEC on recent versions of FreeRADIUS, to file bug reports... -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS Development Team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2