On 11/07/07, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
Thomas Dagonnier wrote:
Would you agree to close that part of the discussion ?
Fine.
sorry, this was a late email and I forgot important details like had in mind "with additionnal (NAC) features" and the "for windows" is implied by the vast majority of windows-based computers.
wpa_supplicant works on Windows. It's already been accepted into nearly all Linux & BSD distributions, too.
and it implemented TNC end of last month (oops, that was already 2 months ago). and I guess opensea will come in 1 month (according to their timeframe). I was just saying that 802.1x TNC (or NAC) capable supplicant were more important than applets - IMHO
Notice how the OpenSEA announcement included a quote from me, and mentioning FreeRADIUS?
yes, I noticed - but are you taking an active role there or just supporting by helping with freeradius (as a reference, std-based radius server) ?
so there's no plan, but a properly formatted, cleaned version would find its place ?
As always, patches are welcome.
Would you be open to implement Microsoft's IF-TNCCS-SOH in that context ?
If someone sends a patch, yes. I'm too busy to do the work myself.
Ok. I guess it may have something to do with that 2.0 thing (not web 2.0 - hopefully). thanks for answering, thomas