Hi, As you are undoubtedly aware, the ubuntu/debian package of freeradius comes without the wimax module (despite having the wimax module) installed. My own attempts to compile/install/build deb package for ubuntu always die with the infamous "undefined reference to `lt_preloaded_symbols'" that apparently has even Alan opting to forsake libtool. Because many people would still like to implement mac authentication on a wimax network, I was wondering whether the c subroutine that does this in the module: /* * Fix Calling-Station-Id. Damn you, WiMAX! */ vp = pairfind(request->packet->vps, PW_CALLING_STATION_ID); if (vp && (vp->length == 6)) { int i; uint8_t buffer[6]; memcpy(buffer, vp->vp_octets, 6); /* * RFC 3580 Section 3.20 says this is the preferred * format. Everyone *SANE* is using this format, * so we fix it here. */ for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { fr_bin2hex(&buffer[i], &vp->vp_strvalue[i * 3], 1); vp->vp_strvalue[(i * 3) + 2] = '-'; } vp->vp_strvalue[(5*3)+2] = '\0'; vp->length = (5*3)+2; DEBUG2("rlm_wimax: Fixing WiMAX binary Calling-Station-Id to %s", buffer); } can be easily translated to perl to rewrite the calling-station-id (only when it does not meet the standard), as that module works fine and is correctly compiled? If so, would anyone here be able to mash up a few lines of perl code to this end? Please? I, unfortunately am not familiar enough with c to translate the logic behind the code above flawlessly. Hopefully, JamesTM Irrationally held truths may be more harmful than reasoned errors. - Thomas H. Huxley On 10/05/2011 02:10 PM, freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org wrote:
Send Freeradius-Users mailing list submissions to freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freeradius.org/mailman/listinfo/freeradius-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org
You can reach the person managing the list at freeradius-users-owner@lists.freeradius.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Freeradius-Users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: FreeRadius with Eduroam - Accounting (Alan DeKok) 2. Re: MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment (tonimanel) 3. Re: FreeRadius with Eduroam - Accounting (Phil Mayers) 4. Mac access mixed ldap access same NAS (Alejandro Gandara) 5. Re: MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment (Fajar A. Nugraha) 6. Re: MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment (tonimanel) 7. MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment (tonimanel) 8. Re: MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment (Alan DeKok) 9. Re: MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment (tonimanel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:09:39 +0200 From: Alan DeKok<aland@deployingradius.com> Subject: Re: FreeRadius with Eduroam - Accounting To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID:<4E8C2CE3.7000802@deployingradius.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
It's a bad way of doing it. At least with replicate every accounting packet has a chance... Using Acct-Delay-Time you'll end up dumping anywhere between 1-15 seconds accounting data for all realms if one realm is unreachable. <shrug>
if (Packet-Transmit-Counter> 5) { ok } else { ... proxy ... }
If the home server doesn't get it after 5 tries, throw it away.
In 2.1.10& later, IIRC.
Alan DeKok.
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:49:16 -0700 (PDT) From: tonimanel<antoniofernandez@fabergames.com> Subject: Re: MySQL and FreeRADIUS environment To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Message-ID:<1317811756198-4872269.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
My FreeRADIU version is 2.1.10 on Debian. Suggest me update? Or is a valid verstion to work and implement freeradius replication with radrelay?
Thanks,
-- View this message in context: http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/MySQL-and-FreeRADIUS-environment-tp4... Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:50:12 +0100 From: Phil Mayers<p.mayers@imperial.ac.uk> Subject: Re: FreeRadius with Eduroam - Accounting To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Message-ID:<4E8C3664.5070000@imperial.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 05/10/11 09:56, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
On 5 Oct 2011, at 10:40, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/05/2011 09:26 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
I guess that's ok, in that it stops an unresponsive realm blocking other realms, but wouldn't another solution be to add a config item to the detail reader to drop packets which are>X seconds old? if (Acct-Delay-Time> 3600) { ok } else { ... do proxy .... }
Ah ha! Clever. I had forgotten the detail reader created/updated that attribute. Yay FreeRADIUS! It's a bad way of doing it. At least with replicate every accounting packet has a chance... Using Acct-Delay-Time you'll end up dumping anywhere between 1-15 seconds accounting data for all realms if one realm is unreachable. Whereas with rlm_replicate, you risk dropping arbitrary accounting packets because there is no retry. There is no ideal solution, because radius accounting was never designed for the kind of loosely-coupled federation that is Eduroam.
For me, since most Eduroam sites don't care about receiving federated accounting, my primary concern is for my server to carry on functioning, and that means the detail file should not grow without bound. I don't really care how that happens - as long as it does.
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:06:33 +0200 From: Alejandro Gandara<agandara@optaresolutions.com> Subject: Mac access mixed ldap access same NAS To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <CAF40+uwJa0dZ-3YNcr=QkRu1NUrL6Lhy77W2RhEPDuNWjtbGkg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi list,
does someone know if Its possible mix MAC auth with ldap AUTH in the same NAS.
I mean, I have multiple connection to one NAS but a few users will access through mac address, and others will access trhough auth ldap + passwords.
Nowadays Ive configured ldap access but I dont know how to configure freeradius to allow connect a few users(16-20) trhough mac auth.
As always thanks you very much for your time and peacence.
Regards,
Alejandro G?ndara Junior System Administrator