Hi Alan, when will be the next stable release with 3.2.x? Greetings Am 2016-08-15 12:22, schrieb Philipp Trenz:
Hi Alan,
thanks for these tips. 3.0.4 was at the repo of RHEL7, so I used it. But with your advice I'll compile the latest 3.1.X version. Mr Paffrath at the DFN, responsible for the Radius servers, is just in vacation. So I try to collect as much information as possible to question him, when he's back. With RadSec I'm not shure what I need, it should just function with the DFN servers ;) I'll see ...
Greetings!
Am 2016-08-15 12:00, schrieb freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org:
Message: 2 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:32:19 +0000 From: A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Subject: Re: FR3 RadSec for Eduroam (esp. Germany & DFN servers) Message-ID: <20160815093219.GB10649@lboro.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
I heared of different voices. At https://wiki.geant.org/display/H2eduroam/freeradius3-flr it says FR3 can replace third party software like RadSecProxy, but I also heared that the implementation does not work that fine.
documentation is always historical.... that was probably based on early implementations.....
At the moment it's going to be FreeRADIUS 3.0.4 on a RHEL7.2, but also could go up to the latest stable release, if this would fix issues.
3.0.4 is old and creaky, containing many random bugs. I would recommend that you use the recent 3.1.x - thus getting yourself ready for the 3.2.x stable release and having all latest features but not bleeding edge 4.x stuff. if you must have 3.0.x then use 3.0.11 (or 3.0.12 when that slips out) - but be aware that it'll be legacy release when 3.2 arrives.
what RADSEC features do you want? if you chat with your NRO in DFN they'll give you their advice....as there are other things they may expect or wnat you to do....
alan