Axel Luttgens wrote:
Perhaps could it be worth to enhance the description of use_tunneled_reply as well?
Perhaps you could suggest some text as well?
With the current comment, use_tunneled_reply could be understood as a way to convey the inner User-Name only; but, unless I'm wrong, any attribute, even a private one, is liable to be brought to the outer session.
That's what the comments say.
Moreover, the mechanism activated by that setting probably deserves a better emphasis; in particular, I'm thinking at its protocol-awareness you have described in a previous message.
Patches are always welcome. I'm prepared to fix bugs. But if you want more documentation, then you need to write it, and submit it. Otherwise, you're asking me to do work that you refuse to do. Alan DeKok.