On 22.04.15 16:29, Alan DeKok wrote:
On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Gerald Vogt <vogt@spamcop.net> wrote:
So may I suggest that the post-proxy file only contains actually useful and working examples.
In these situations, I may suggest sending a patch via github.
Pointing out a problem is nice. Giving a fix is MUCH nicer.
Generally, I agree with you but in this case I hardly know enough to what the filters really can do and what not to describe them accurately or how to modify that filter rules to accept what it currently suggests: accept Service-Type Framed-User or Login-User or accept Login-IP-Host 192.0.2.1 or 192.0.2.2. I guess it is possible with a regular expression. And I guess you already know how to write that down while I would have to carefully try and test it to find out how it's really done... Thanks, Gerald