Hi,
server_pool ja-net_pool { type = client-balance home_server = ja-net-roaming0_server home_server = ja-net-roaming0_server6 home_server = ja-net-roaming1_server home_server = ja-net-roaming1_server6 ... }
yes - but I wouldnt advise to do it that way - as all you are doing there is using one client balance - with the alternates being the same server.... ie roaming0 or roaming-ipv6 - if roaming0 was down/dead then the ipv6 one is too. so, better with eg ja-net-roaming0_server6 ja-net-roaming1_server6 ja-net-roaming2_server6 ja-net-roaming0_server ja-net-roaming2_server ja-net-roaming3_server ..or actually, why bother with IPv4 - just go native... ja-net-roaming0_server6 ja-net-roaming1_server6 ja-net-roaming2_server6 you might want to look at client-port-balance or the hashed balance method as you get more spread through the remote proxies then. also, keep the name in the config but add the IPv6/IP address in /etc/hosts (also, dont forget that you'll need to add a listener to your virtual-server or radiusd.conf too - you cannot have ipv4 and ipv6 listener in the same statement - you just add a second listener alan