Artur Hecker <hecker@enst.fr> wrote:
you know I remember a lot of users having _major_ problems with SCSI because it was too forgiving for simple setups...
The server enforces sanity on what it needs. What it doesn't need it ignores.
why not at least mentioning that the server has just ignored a configuration token for whatever reason? e.g. ignoring thread_pool because -X was given at the command line. might help someone to see that his new config is not accepted. and don't you "patches are welcome" on me :-)
Uh... OK. The real answer, though, is that the configuration files are interpreted *after* they're read. So doing what you suggest would mean having the second pass over the configuration files set flags on what was used, and adding a *third* pass that would print out configuration items that weren't flagged on the second one. I'm not sure it's worth it, honestly. Alan DeKok.