23 Jun
2016
23 Jun
'16
9:31 a.m.
On Jun 23, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Scott Armitage <S.P.Armitage@lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
I noticed an issue using the NAS-IP-Address. This bug (if it is one) did disappear for a while but now seems to be back. Is this a bug or should I retrieve the value in a different way?
What's the bug? The debug output shows that there's no NAS-IP-Address being expanded. Is there one in the packet? Alan DeKok.