Le 30 août 2014 à 18:28, Axel Luttgens a écrit :
Le 30 août 2014 à 16:38, Alan DeKok a écrit :
Alan DeKok wrote:
Unfortunately, that is how it works. If you read the debug output,
I've updated the example inner-tunnel example,
Yes, I noticed that this morning. :-)
More exactly, I only had seen the next to last change while writing the above. But the current comment appears to be exactly the one I would have dreamed to write myself. ;-) Perhaps could it be worth to enhance the description of use_tunneled_reply as well? With the current comment, use_tunneled_reply could be understood as a way to convey the inner User-Name only; but, unless I'm wrong, any attribute, even a private one, is liable to be brought to the outer session. Moreover, the mechanism activated by that setting probably deserves a better emphasis; in particular, I'm thinking at its protocol-awareness you have described in a previous message. Regards, Axel