Re: State of RadSec in FR 3.0.10

On Nov 24, 2015, at 6:01 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@uni-koeln.de> wrote:

we have never used RadSec before but are planning to do so for Eduroam. I found this (three years old) document from GÉANT on it, and was planning on trying it that way:

<https://wiki.geant.org/display/H2eduroam/freeradius3-flr>

But our national Eduroam center (DFN) recommends using radsecproxy instead, because according to them RadSec isn't yet stable in FR 3.0. What's your take on that? To be honest, I'd rather help fix problems in FR's RadSec implementation than install another piece of software - unless you recommend against it.

RedSec is stable in 3.0.10. Alan DeKok.