Alan Buxey wrote:
its an interesting test....why are you not using the latest release of FreeRADIUS (2.1.10 ?)
2.1.6 has worked fine for us, until now when we need some new functionality. Alan Buxey wrote:
is there a reason why you want so many virtual servers listening on the same IP address? It seems a strange design - surely policies and unlang within the server could operate the same scheme more efficiently?
I believe you might be right Alan. It is not really the same IP-address that is necessary. We need a policy per port. If you saw my earlier post with user-name conversion titled "FR 2.1.6 add realm to User-Name before Proxy by listening port". This is what i am trying to accomplish. a port per customer where user-name conversion is done before proxy.. My unlang skills are not that good i am afraid. But if you can point me towards a simpler solution i would more than happy. Thanks and regards Mika -- View this message in context: http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Failed-remembering-handle-for-proxy-... Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.