On the standard CentOS/RHEL platform, the only dependency hell you would have is if you used the Fedora SRPM and didn't replace the SPEC file. It includes a reference to systemd-units which does not really exist for the EL6 platform. All other build packages should be standard and present and not present any issues. Anyway… Nick from RedHat is on this list, so it would be a question for Nick, how 2.2.x could be pushed into the 6.x repos to replace 2.1.12 (the last official version). Stefan ________________________________ From: freeradius-users-bounces+stefan.paetow=ja.net@lists.freeradius.org [freeradius-users-bounces+stefan.paetow=ja.net@lists.freeradius.org] on behalf of Brandon B. Jozsa [bjozsa@gmail.com] Sent: 14 June 2014 13:39 To: Alan Buxey Cc: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Issues with building Freeradius on CentOS 6.5: need rlm_cache It wasn't any limitation of the documentation or freeradius at all. To me, it's a limitation of some of the Linux distros. I'm a fan of FreeBSD for servers, but our requirement is using either RHEL or Centos. When you build on those systems it seems like you're locked in dependency hell. I could have built from spec, but then some other operations group has to support it after it's developed. And of course that makes the system less supportable for the masses. Is there any way to get this 2.5 version into the Centos 6 stable repos? My main issue was the need for rlm_cache...as it's a direct requirement for my needs in this case. -- Brandon B. Jozsa Principal Of Technology Security - AT&T - Chief Security Office Phone: 704.966.9576<tel:704.966.9576> AT&T Proprietary; not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies. This message and any attachments to it contain confidential business information intended solely for the recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. On Jun 14, 2014, at 3:40 AM, Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk<mailto:A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk>> wrote: I guess it depends on what your search terms were but it's always surprising how many people use 3rd party docs rather than the official docs and how many people write up their own web pages rather than contributing to or fixing the official docs. alan Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238